When George Stephanopoulos so rudely queried Sen. Barack Obama about his long-standing connections to unrepentant domestic terrorist William Ayers during a recent Democratic debate, many conservative newshounds cheered. At long last, Americans had been introduced to a name that only a handful of right-leaning news sources had previously explored. Obama challenged the question’s relevancy, carefully avoided details, and pivoted to another topic of discussion. The damage was done, though, and his campaign was forced to issue a “fact” sheet to debunk any nasty implications the “distraction” of a question may have raised. Team Obama informed readers that a) Obama himself is far too young to have been a member of the Weather Underground, b) The mainstream media consensus is that Obama’s ties to Ayers are irrelevant, c) All charges against Ayers were dropped, and d) Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn, are actually pretty “mainstream” these days. Three of these four defenses ring hollow.
Read More of Debunking Obama's Ayers "Fact Sheet" off-site...Dan Kelley says:
My thinking on this is that despite his radical chic associations, whenever the going gets tough, Bill Ayers, plays the prodigal son and calls on his wealthy family to bail him out. Thomas Ayers was a top executive at Commonwealth Edison for years.
I imagine that in addition to hiring the best defense attorneys that money could buy for his nitwit son, Pater Ayers probably showered sizeable contributions upon various institutions of higher learning. I think that this practice used to be called "simony" when church positions were sold to the highest bidder.
Pat Hickey says:
The 'national' dialogue on Ayers/Dohrn's influence upon Senator Obama pales beneath the complete glossing over of the continued 'accaptance' of these two domestic terrorists in Chicago Avedemic circles.
Why, but more radically, How, did these two secure imbedded posts in the teaching community and by whose direct influence, insistence and complete disregard for American safety and good sence is a question Chicago's 'hard-hitting' journalists should content themselves.
Why has no Chicago journalist dug up the facts?
They have no problem looking at the genesis Streets and Santitation worker's clout pedigree.
Who made the call?
How did the positions get secured?
What was the quid pro quo?
Qui Bono?
Qui . . .you know the rest.