Tuesday, January 6, 2009 Last Update: 9:37 a.m.
Light Snow Fog/Mist: Currently 29° F
Dow: 9015.1 +62.21

Aw, How Touching! For the First Time Michelle Obama’s Proud of Her Country

For several times in this presidential campaign, the Obamas have been caught seeming rather embarrassed about their country and old-fashioned patriotism.

And it’s not by happenstance or accident. Barack Obama, the rock-star who sets crowds of young philistines swaying who are too young and too ignorant to know who Che Guevara was but who thrill to the coolness of revolution, purposely disdained wearing the American flag symbol on his lapel because purportedly patriotism is too intrinsic to be worn as an ornament. He has been photographed many times during playing of the national anthem with his hands at his side rather than his hand on his heart as candidates for office have been doing for decades. When questioned: oh, patriotism is too precious to be trivialized in this way. One time in a debate he seemingly let slip a view, but he caught himself, that at last he can be proud of his country—but the view was cut short and inconclusive.

But the idea at last we can be proud of our country because voters elect him or voters are worked up about universal health coverage is part of political scat talk that substitutes for issues and hard thinking in the Obama camp. Imagine: at last we can be proud of our country because of Obama. How shallow a token tribute for a country which has become the epicenter for freedom, decency and moral probity around the world. The country John McCain sacrificed five years of his life for and endured beatings from jail guards is all too-too sacrosanct to be glorified by candidates wearing the flag in their lapel. Uncool.

Political scat talk from the Obama side—similar to the decision to diss wearing the flag symbol or to refuse to place your hand on your heart as the anthem is played —is equated with being cool. Now Michelle Obama has become the first to let the idea completely slip out. In Milwaukee on Monday, she said: “Let me tell you, for the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country. Not just because Barack is doing well but I think people are hungry for change.”

This political scat talk from the candidate’s wife is the semi-pornography that has passed as substitute for sentiment since the Obamas became a national phenomenon. It is mindless, yes, thoughtless yes and as shallowly self-centered…all about Me…as the campaign itself. About as logical as the thought enunciated by The Pope of Hope that “you”—the people—“are the change.” Well if the people cheering him as the change and they are all around this Matador of Self-Indulgence, what has taken so long for the “change” they think they want to come? Political scat talk.

If anyone is spoiled from excess advantage either from affirmative action or condescension from guilt-ridden white know-nothings because of the supposed “infirmity” of being born black and female in a white man’s world it is this pampered and over-lavished Princeton undergrad, Harvard Law grad who has been needlessly revered, overpaid and overhyped not because of what she has done but of her race card playing with adroit aplomb. Not to be proud of your country for any reason other than certain cult liberals swaying to her husband’s political scat talk says it all. These are the words of an over-pampered celebrity who has become obsessed with her own importance. Her acumen is on par with her legal scholarship which she demonstrated by defending her husband’s opposition as a state senator to allowing babies born from a botched abortion to continue life.

The time is coming when this scat talking duo start understanding that the change in their lives will come, all right…and is about due to hit…when Late Night talk show hosts plus John Stewart of The Daily Show start playing verbatim transcripts of the mindless Barack scat talk nonsense and making justified fun of it. Obama’s brief explanation “what she meant was, this is the first time she’s been proud of the politics of America.” REALLY? Yeah. “Because she’s pretty cynical about the political process.” REALLY? Does she think she hasn’t benefited from it or her husband from a process that elevated him from a law firm to the state senate to the U.S. Senate before he was 45? What—too slow for her?

Poor baby. Get the hook. It’s about time to subject the two pampered rock stars and their scat pol talk of exaggeration and hype to the criticism every other candidate gets…so she gets a taste of what some of the others less pampered are going through.

_______________________-

Thomas F. Roeser is chairman of the editorial board for The Chicago Daily Observer.

Commentary:

1

Brett says:

You're a cad. Does your body really naturally produce so much bile, or do you milk more of it especially for your employer? If snide anger, rather than any substantive political thought is all you can offer, I think your market will very soon dry up. People are sick of nastiness. It doesn't seem to be what's selling this year, I'm sorry for you.

February 20, 2008 at 4:06 p.m.
2

Pat Hickey says:

'People are sick of nastiness'

Goodness sakes, Brett, and you came off like Dame May Witty and just choke full of sharp substantive political thought.

Obvious irony is sarcasm - it gets the attention of dim-wits better and more politically correct than a sockful of quarters.

February 20, 2008 at 4:47 p.m.
3

Teri O'Brien says:

Mr. Roeser, as usual, you are spot on, not only in your insights, but in your terrific writing. As for Brett's comments, as usual, one who attempts to defend vacuous liberals resorts to characterizing the truth as "nastiness." How do you "attack" a liberal? Recite his voting record and repeat his statements.

February 20, 2008 at 4:54 p.m.
4

Mario says:

Yea, Obama's wife would be scary in the White House. Almost as scary as Hilary was. I think Obama is a mainstream guy, but his wife, she still thinks the Black Panters are for civil rights.

February 20, 2008 at 5:18 p.m.
5

Obamania says:

Her comment was narcissistic. It was approved by her and read twice. You cannot nuance this. Her place - get real - her place as she admits, was being sent to a prestigious college ahead of more qualified candidates (based on grades/sat scores) with tax payer money. Why this is offensive is real - because it disrespects all the efforts of everyone, black and white, to give her the opportunities she received. Those people who made those sacrifices were called Americans. She should be proud of what they did for all of us.

February 20, 2008 at 5:48 p.m.
6

jules says:

Oh, i feel sorry for the girl. Proud to be an american for the first time. is she that blind? Obama just another astute politician. I don't want Michelle as a first lady if she's never been proud of being an accomplished african american. Vote anything else, but please snap out of the Obama syndrome.

February 20, 2008 at 10:27 p.m.
7

elizabeth bennett says:

i notice that Ms. ivy leaguer is enjoying a million-plus-dollar mansion she got at a bargain price-reduction thanks to her family's dear friend rezko, not to mention the huge lot next-door to the mansion, vouchsafed for her until she and Prince Charming could pay for it, by that same dear, dear friend rezko. not to mention the ridiculously huge, six-figure salary increase she received a second or two after her husband became a senator....she hasn't turned up her nose at enjoying the, er, fruits of that america she hasn't been proud of until it earned her approval by awarding worship to her husband. and let's not forget her other classic bon mot, that obama was "the only one who can save our souls." why have these people been given a free ride by the american media? why have they not been scrutinized and vetted?

February 21, 2008 at 4:21 a.m.
8

Dan Kelley says:

Gadzooks! Michelle Obama has done a complete one hundred and eighty degree reversal!

Now, she claims to have been always proud of her country.

Mary Mitchell will be so perplexed bu this stunning change of course.

February 21, 2008 at 9:25 a.m.
9

Nick says:

Michele Obama has a right to express those thoughts.

We have just lived through 7+ years of Bush double speak that denigrated science, truth and justice.

We have seen Bush political cronies installed in important government positions for which they weren't qualified-except that they were political cronies.

We have seen a political party (Republicans) rife with corruption. An overwhelming number of Bush loyalists in Congress have been indicted for ethical lapses over the last few years.

We have been led to war in Iraq under false pretenses by Bush and his cronies.

Our federal budget has exploded in debt, and it was exploded by a Republican party that promised fiscal responsibility.

And we now have a Republican candidate for President who has surrounded himself with lobbyists for political advisers. If McCain is elected (God forbid) these lobbyists will be running the country.

Yes, there was a lot to be NOT proud of over the last 7 years.

And Michele has a right (and DUTY) to point this out.

February 23, 2008 at 9:04 p.m.

Comments are closed for this entry